Papers and such

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Flawed Funding for Public Schools?

We are told through our entire lives that if anyone wants to be a somebody in life, they must go to school. Everyone has the opportunity to go to a public school, but are all public schools equal? Should it matter where you live (and even where you come from) to determine the quality of your education in public schools? With public school being funded by property taxes there seems to be a bias in school funding. Where the rich live, property taxes are usually higher, so their school districts ultimately have more money to spend on children. Poorer districts likewise have less money to spend on each student. Is it fair to children that just because of their parent’s financial background and current standings they may et a worse education than a child who may only live a few miles away, but in a wealthier area? As always there are 2 sides to this debate.
Equalizing public funding for schools would give every child an equal opportunity. Have all the money from property taxes collected and distributed equally throughout all districts so each child has the same opportunity would get rid of much of the bias in school funding. It wouldn’t matter if you go to a predominately non-white school, because ever child, whether he or she is white, black, Hispanic or any other race would be receiving the same amount of money to be educated. Everyone would start on the same page. Equalizing funding could also help get rid of the gap between rich and poor in the state and in the country. With everyone getting the same opportunities in school, theoretically would mean more children of every ethnicity and race would graduate and become successful and productive members of society. This may help boost the economy and make the U.S. more productive.
Even though there are good points as to why equalizing the money made by property taxes to all students would be a good decision, there are many good points as to why equalizing public funding for schools would be and is bad. The question whether or not it is fair for the money raised by a higher property tax payer to go to a child who could be hundreds of miles away is the first thing which comes to mind. Is it fair for the money coming from people who have higher property taxes, probably because they have worked long and hard to afford their nice house, to go another child’s education who is not even in their school district? In chapter 9 or The Shame of the Nation, Kozol gives an example of children who are bused to other districts to receive a better education from at the wish of the parents. That way, kids who go to a “poorer” school have a better opportunity to succeed. Maybe if parents took an active role in their children’s schooling, and helped them to succeed, they could over come the obstacle of going to a school with less money for students. Once out of public school, things such as financial aid and loans can help with the cost of school if they or they’re family cannot afford college. Kozol gives the example of a young black girl who hadn’t dreamed of going to college before being bused to a primarily white school (p.229). Is this the fault of a faulty school district, or the fault of her family to not try and help her go to college? I know it my life, it was more my family than my peers who pushed me to go to college after high school to “make something of myself.”
Looking at the Minnesota Department of Education’s website, I found the demographics for both St. Paul’s and Minneapolis’ public schools. Both have a very diverse and pretty much equal student population according to race. One thing that I found very shocking, however, was that St. Paul seemed to have a greater graduation rate even though 36% of the students had a limited English proficiency (compared to Minneapolis’ 23%) and 71% of the students were on free or reduced lunches (compared to Minneapolis’ 67%). It seems that more of St. Paul’s students come from poorer families or families who primarily speak another language, yet more graduate. Perhaps this is because the over all values of the members of both communities and surroundings effect a child’s education, more than just how much money they get to be schooled because of property taxes.

1 Comments:

Blogger Ticha Creativating said...

Just a thought... many affluent families in the USA have "social capital" that they are born into such as speaking English without a "thick accent," understanding how to navigate the public school systems of the USA; or simply inheritance money/property or a trust fund that is passed down from a previous generation. As an urban educator who sees very clearly how hard the families of my poor and/or immigrant students' families are working to get them to college, I would urge you to spend some time examining the realities of a lot of low-income or immigrant families in urban areas before you claim that "will" or "parental support" is the reason why so many of our low-income students are not succeeding. Educational funding policies has a lot to do with it, but so do housing, health, and immigration policies. Its all connected.

11:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home